Two nation theory by Savarkar-a LIE

1 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 43 Second

A thread by Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within u @SitaramYechury sir from an ex-Marxist!

Savarkar didn’t even use term”two nation”in his Calcutta address of 1939. Perhaps someone passed you wrong WhatsApp. Read this thread where I put excerpts of his speech.

Refute should u hv substance.Sitaram Yechury@SitaramYechury

Savarkar forwarded the disastrous two-nation theory in December 1939 in his presidential address to the Hindu Mahasabha. Jinnah did so in his presidential address to the Muslim League in 1940. In 1943, Savarkar said he had no quarrel with Jinnah. (1/2)1,915Twitter Ads info and privacy1,015 people are talking about thisn I’m starting of directly with part where #Savarkar speaks of how “Hindus” are nation in themselves.

He criticises Territorial-Unity to define nation as conceived by Congress & calls it an European Concept. Further he cites eg of Poland & Czechoslovakia.

n According to #Savarkar they broke because Cultural Identity is only substantial one compared to “Territorial Unity”. He points out categorically that only those nations survived which which despite being territorial has culture, linguistics type affinities as root. Eg,France.

#Savarkar contests that Hindus have India both as “Fatherland” & “Holyland” hence the naturally bound by India as nationalities. He also argues that for this phenomenon Hindus’ patriotism is doubly assured. He says: Hindus are no treaty nation but organic National-being.

#Savarkar states that even most utilitarian Nations have religious, linguistic bindings, viz Britain & France.
He says: that despite multiple differences Hindus are connected from Kashmir to Madras & Sindh to Assam by culture. But Muslims connect with non-Indian Culture.

@SitaramYechury sir, in-fact #Ambedkar too agreed to the Savarkar’s second part of argument (6/n). He mentions that: Islam can never allow a True Muslim to adopt India as his motherland.

Source:Pakistan or Partition of India, p329,B.R.Ambedkar

n Let’s come back to #Savarkar ‘s speech of 1939 which you tried to mention @SitaramYechury ji. Savarkar goes on to revere what #Ambedkar too echoed.

He clearly mentions that Indian Muslims have problem because India is neither nor shall it ever become Dar-Ul-Islam.

#Savarkar points out very clearly what is the phenomenon of the day.@SitaramYechury u turn blind eye,when Islamists connect to Arab or Turk more than India.

They want separate lang(Urdu) which relates with Arabian.He points how Konkan-Converts campaign against Hindu names.

n Savarkar goes on to state how the Hindu names & History is being Arabised to create complete disconnect from Hindu Ancestory.

He was indirectly talking of the colonisation by the Islamic Forces. n #Savarkar defines”Swarajya” for Hindus.He says that it’s Rajya where their “swatva” & “Hindutva” is asserted. He mentions Aurangzeb & Tipu were mere sons of converted mothers. They were territorial Indians whose rule proved worst enemy of Hindudom. Hence Guru Govind,Shivaji

@SitaramYechury ji, now it gets interesting, perhaps shoes in face of Savarkar haters & #Ambedkar glorifiers.

#Savarkar says that Muslims can enjoy equal rights as far as they don’t encroach Hindu rights.

Did Jinnah had similar opinion SITARAM sir? Pl clarify!

@SitaramYechury ji #Ambedkar criticised #Savarkar for this stand while declaring his option was distinct from Jinnah. Jinnah wanted India to be cut while Savarkar didn’t. Read excerpt from his book: Pakistan or Partition of India.Aabhas Maldahiyar @Aabhas24 · Replying to @Aabhas24

11/n #Savarkar defines”Swarajya” for Hindus.He says that it’s Rajya where their “swatva” & “Hindutva” is asserted. He mentions Aurangzeb & Tipu were mere sons of converted mothers. They were territorial Indians whose rule proved worst enemy of Hindudom. Hence Guru Govind,Shivaji

View image on Twitter

Aabhas Maldahiyar @Aabhas24

12/n @SitaramYechury ji, now it gets interesting, perhaps shoes in face of Savarkar haters & #Ambedkar glorifiers.#Savarkar says that Muslims can enjoy equal rights as far as they don’t encroach Hindu rights.

Did Jinnah had similar opinion SITARAM sir? Pl clarify!

View image on Twitter

184 · Bengaluru South, IndiaTwitter Ads info and privacy90 people are talking about this

n For the opinion of #Savarkar about Muslims #Ambedkar asserts that his views have much more merit than that of Congress for his stand is clear about Muslims.

But calls Savarkar’s step to be illogical.

@SitaramYechury sir it gets even more interesting. Pl read on.

About Post Author

M K

A hard core Vedas Follower
Happy
Happy
100 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleppy
Sleppy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

On Key

Related Posts

BEEF history of 12000 years

The Story Behind PopIt Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis,

Archives

%d bloggers like this: